- Altrincham Football Club Fans Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  



+ - Altrincham Football Club Fans Forum
 Recent Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
 on: Yesterday at 07:56:16 PM 
Started by Timperley The Best - Last post by oneedham
Baffles me why we don't try Hanks......

He did well there towards the end of last season

This would then allow Kossy No.10, which is his best position because he drops deep to help the CM's and his distribution on the wing is poor.

Then we can play our best wide players Mooney and Colclough.

Hanks is strong, intelligent, can keep the ball and has a decent strike on him.

We have tried so many no.9's give Hanks or Leitch-Smith 10 games.

 on: Yesterday at 07:55:10 PM 
Started by Altyrocket - Last post by wayno
Surely the security will be an ongoing requirement?
absolutely it will be part of the changes required for full attendance . We need it no doubt about that . But to be manhandled for no reason is not acceptable .

 on: Yesterday at 07:42:34 PM 
Started by Timperley The Best - Last post by Timperley The Best
We need a striker to fit in to the system we play asap

 on: Yesterday at 07:33:54 PM 
Started by Altyrocket - Last post by cheshire cat
Surely the security will be an ongoing requirement?

 on: Yesterday at 07:24:14 PM 
Started by robininstockport - Last post by cheshire cat
I thought the rest of the team weren't on Pringle's wavelength. A bit like when we had JJ. Porter seems out of his depth. How did he get into the Stoke squad. I missed the first goal but apart from Mooney my MoM was Senior.

I thought Southend did a professional job on us to get the three points

 on: Yesterday at 07:22:13 PM 
Started by robininstockport - Last post by distancetraveller
Bad day at the office today.  I was one of the play Pringle fan club, but he didnít have a good first half today and was rightly hooked at HT.

I thought had we scored the pen then we would have gone on to win the game.

Parkys face at the end said it all for me . He didnít look very Happy at all

I didnít think Southend were that good and thought we would have won today..

They do feign injury very easy.

Will be glad to be able to stand up again to watch the game. It was Baltic in that Main Stand.

 on: Yesterday at 07:20:52 PM 
Started by Altyrocket - Last post by wayno
I have posted on the Facebook page . The way I was treated today by a steward was abhorrent

 on: Yesterday at 07:05:39 PM 
Started by robininstockport - Last post by Alty Bri
  ;D ;D ;D
Me too!

 on: Yesterday at 07:01:39 PM 
Started by Altyrocket - Last post by oneedham
It was toxic in there today. Security & stewards from all over the North West,who were rude and chaotic in their manner. No interest at all in the club.
I was moved 4 times in the first half and wasn't blocking any exit or at the front.
It is so sad and this has all come from a letter within the club. The coward should have the bottle to identify themselves. This is killing us. I am not going back until we are allowed over 3k because I am that angry/upset about it all.
That game should have been switched and any others should until this shower of sh*t passes.
The terraces look as if they have had some pointing work done and that's it.
I was told the security is costing us thousands. Really upsetting.

Going forward the club should advertise for there own stewards and SIA staff now they are paying people. probably to short notice before. The good thing about using outside agencies is if you need more they can supply them at short notice, But i do think the club should have their own core of trained stewards and SIA licensed staff.

As per the safety procedures when i was Safety officer i had to update them and rewrite a lot took me most of the summer.

Totally agree.

I would suggest one of the Director's role should be to concentrate on ground safety and stewarding.
Pay someone to come and do in-house training to those who want to be there as Stewards, not people who love the power and create drama.
We need to have our own team of security and Steward's moving forward. More of them and trained to the standard required.

 on: Yesterday at 06:47:24 PM 
Started by robininstockport - Last post by jhcorbett
I've hardly ever been critical of PP but he really does need to learn that not starting with your best team is going to cost you at National level - we're not Evostik now.

Everyone knows the best starting 11 at 5 o'clock. People on here have been banging on about "Pringle must start" etc etc etc. Well today he did. We were just crap in the first half.

Sorry, I don't agree with this.

Clear patterns are emerging. Peers and Pringle are pretty much always best as impact subs. I like Pringle when he comes on but I have never seen him start well (which is a mystery tbh).

Mooney is (and has been all season) our most dangerous forward and as such should always start when fit. That's pretty obvious too.

The lad from Stoke. I'm not sure what he has contributed in his time with us, other than to be withdrawn at 2 down.

I said it at kick off to my lad, not at 5 o'clock. PP needs to learn or teams like Stockport and Wrexham will be out of sight by half time.

Credit to Southend though. They had a game plan and took advantage of our mistakes. I'd take their number 9 (Murphy?) in an instant. Dalby was very good too.

Yep, fair enough. I pretty much agree with your views on those Alty players. Just found the afternoon very frustrating overall, less so after an ale or two now.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10