Might I postulate the following please?
When we signed both Mitchley and Brooke we did not have Damian Reeves and nor did we anticipate that we would have
Also I would be surprised if many people thought (hoped perhaps but not thought) that Duncan would start as he has done
We now have Reevesy, and Duncan has started extremely well.
The Club needed strikers on the basis that we might have had an eighteen year old and a bloke from Liverpool who was suspended for the start of the season and was perhaps less than reliable either on the basis of form or discipline hence we signed the two that we did. Incidentally I am not classing James Lawrie as a central striker for these purposes
Once we re-signed Reeves, and Duncan started pre season (and subsequently the season proper) so well, Mitchley and Brooke seemed to play less. Hence I do have a degree of sympathy with both of them who have suddenly become less important in the eyes of the fans with the associated increased level of scrutiny and therefore criticism.
As an aside, am I the only one who DOESN'T see Duncan as a wide right player but as a central striker?