|
|
|
Mrs Warbouys
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2018, 08:19:48 AM » |
|
If I’m interpreting what’s happened correctly it’s a mad set of circumstances. If you trawl through the disciplinary lists on the fa website you can see potentially what’s what. This may be wrong but it looks as if James Pollard played a game for Farsley whilst he was supposed to be suspended. Farsley lost that game, during the week he moved to Shaw lane AQUAFORCE, and played in their 5-0 win over fa trophy last 16 winners Warrington town. On that basis, the suspension was still live and shaw lane AQUAFORCE will Potentially have 3 points deducted. Also of interest on there, halesowen played a lad for 3 games in which they picked up four points, including a derby win over Stourbridge, who was still registered with Solihull moors. The FA fined them six thousand quid for this but I’m wondering if the league could possibly impose a four point deduction also. This may of course all be wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mallorca Alty
|
|
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2018, 09:11:41 AM » |
|
The inconsistency of the rules stems from when we deducted the full 18 points for playing James Robinson for something that wasn't our fault. Only for AFC Wimbledon to be deducted only 3 points for committing a similar offence.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We should be beating teams like these
|
|
|
|
robininstockport
|
|
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2018, 09:27:26 AM » |
|
Inconsistent indeed. Shaw Lane have history aswell
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We're Alty FC, we're on our way back
|
|
|
|
Mrs Warbouys
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2018, 09:30:03 AM » |
|
Inconsistent indeed. Shaw Lane have history aswell
Shaw lane won the title on the back of wittons points deduction late last season, it would have took an odd set of results on the final day but wittons three docked points secured the title just before the last round of games |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GB Alty
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2018, 01:48:12 PM » |
|
Inconsistent indeed. Shaw Lane have history aswell
Shaw lane won the title on the back of wittons points deduction late last season, it would have took an odd set of results on the final day but wittons three docked points secured the title just before the last round of games incorrect Witton had already lost the title mathematically when the points deduction was awarded (and announced) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Warbouys
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2018, 02:34:58 PM » |
|
Inconsistent indeed. Shaw Lane have history aswell
Shaw lane won the title on the back of wittons points deduction late last season, it would have took an odd set of results on the final day but wittons three docked points secured the title just before the last round of games incorrect Witton had already lost the title mathematically when the points deduction was awarded (and announced) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Warbouys
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2018, 02:37:11 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Warbouys
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2018, 04:43:52 PM » |
|
If I’m interpreting what’s happened correctly it’s a mad set of circumstances. If you trawl through the disciplinary lists on the fa website you can see potentially what’s what. This may be wrong but it looks as if James Pollard played a game for Farsley whilst he was supposed to be suspended. Farsley lost that game, during the week he moved to Shaw lane AQUAFORCE, and played in their 5-0 win over fa trophy last 16 winners Warrington town. On that basis, the suspension was still live and shaw lane AQUAFORCE will Potentially have 3 points deducted. Also of interest on there, halesowen played a lad for 3 games in which they picked up four points, including a derby win over Stourbridge, who was still registered with Solihull moors. The FA fined them six thousand quid for this but I’m wondering if the league could possibly impose a four point deduction also. This may of course all be wrong
Halesowen have been deducted four points https://t.co/Mm4xCjOlf1 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GB Alty
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2018, 12:35:02 AM » |
|
Shaw Lane won the title by 6 points, Witton's points deduction cost them jack sh*t |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
robininstockport
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2018, 02:47:33 PM » |
|
Have just been told by a director of an Evo Stick team that Shaw Lane will incur a 10 point penalty.
No idea how true or how they have arrived at that .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We're Alty FC, we're on our way back
|
|
|
|
Andrew Flynn
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2018, 02:59:42 PM » |
|
Have just been told by a director of an Evo Stick team that Shaw Lane will incur a 10 point penalty.
No idea how true or how they have arrived at that .
Championies championies ole ole ole |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Still Fabio Bassangue's English tutor.
|
|
|
|
Mrs Warbouys
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2018, 04:04:28 PM » |
|
It would be helpful, but I’m not sure how they can arrive at ten points, they only gained 3 points whilst he was suspended, unless there is something else a miss?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
anglo alty
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2018, 07:11:47 PM » |
|
10pts does sound harsh but I do think teams lower down the pyramid are vulnerable to registration issues mainly because non of the club officials are full time and things can slip through un-noticed as was the case here I think. I don,t think Shaw Lane did it on purpose it is just a costly error on their part as it will put them 16pts behind us and all but end their title ambitions and if they make a fuss they will no doubt be up on a disrepute charge
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Flynn
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2018, 07:24:35 PM » |
|
Have just been told by a director of an Evo Stick team that Shaw Lane will incur a 10 point penalty.
No idea how true or how they have arrived at that .
If that is true, I will show my backside in the Vatican. There is only one outcome here, surely, a 3 point deduction for Shaw Lane. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
