I think that a simple statement on the difference between Warren Peyton and Carlos Logan is that you can rely on Warren Peyton whereas it is patently obvious that Logan is a different matter.
I speak to scouts who come to Moss Lane, the same ones that used to come to United reserve fixtures, and including a guy who knew him as a kid at City, and the almost unanimous view is that with Logan there is no end product, he gets into a crossing position and then just belts it indiscriminately across goal. Also he is very poor defensively, reluctant to track back. Also prone to 'sulk' if it isn't going his way or he gets criticism
Peyton is an experienced, hard working player, not blessed with the same degree of natural skill but a much better asset for a team in our position.
I'll not lie, I didn't rate Logan after his first two or three matches, he flattered to deceive and looking at the bigger picture contributed very little of a positive nature